This article was extremely interesting to read after reading the article “Gender Assessment of ICT Access and Usage in Africa” for class this week. This article talked about a USAID meeting on gender integration in ICT4D projects. The group gathered to discuss why gender integration in ICT is important, the costs of overlooking it, and how best to fix the gender inequalities in ICT projects. Siobhan Green said that, “without any kind of mitigation, IT reinforces existing inequality. It is amoral in that it follows the pathways of existing inequality or equality… and its up to us, development experts, to try to mitigate against that common pathway”. This relates really well to the article we read for class that talked about the fact that women often do have less access to ICT but it is not directly because of their gender, but because of opportunities or rights they do not get because of their gender, such as education or equal salaries. Both articles suggest that development experts need to take this into account and find some way to solve the problem so that both genders have equal access to ICTs. However, this article went further and listed the five major differences that contribute to women’s ICT usage which are “access and opportunities to use ICTs, social expectations and roles, time and resources, education and economic growth, and business growth”. So, in order to somehow make access to ICTs equitable for women, development experts need to take all five things into account. Siobhan Green also suggested that developers “start with the assumption that different genders will experience the ICTs differently” and realize that ICT’s aren’t gender neutral when coming up with ways to integrate gender into ICT4D projects. I found this interesting because yes I think it’s true that women and men see technology differently, however, I think it is going to be hard for developers to figure out how each gender sees it differently in different cultures and areas of the world.
23 March 2012
ICT4D and Gender
This entry was posted on Friday, March 23rd, 2012 at 12:31 pm and tagged with gender, gender gap and posted in Theory & Framework. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
One response to “ICT4D and Gender”
- RT @gentile_orjulia: “@gatesfoundation: Why banks can, and should, take on the "unbanked": Video interview with @BillGates: http://t.co/6mu… 3 years ago
- Good intentions alone can mean a faulty foundation for #development. Check out our classmate's perspective: tulaneict4d.wordpress.com/2014/04/30/les… #ICT4D 3 years ago
- @AgroamCommunity how interesting! Is equity #access available to most agricultural partners in your communities? #ICT4D 3 years ago
- @wayan_vota Wow! Know of any similar projects or plans to continue/extend this trial? #ICT4D #SMS #literacy 3 years ago
- @melindagates What programs/organizations are combating deadly #mosquitoes? Which are most successful and what are the benefits? #IDEV 3 years ago
- #Internet Africa agriculture Arab Spring bangladesh brazil China Communication computers corruption crowdsourcing Cyber Security Cybersecurity development digital divide disaster relief disaster response disasters e-government e-learning education Facebook failure Failures in ICT4D gender ghana GIS google government Haiti Health healthcare ICT ICT4D ICT4D Professional ICT policy ICTs India infrastructure internet ITU Kenya kony 2012 mapping MDGs mHealth mobile Mobile Phones mobiles mobile technology Nigeria OLPC One Laptop Per Child Peru Poverty Radio Richard Heeks rural development Rwanda SMS Social Media South Africa sustainability Tanzania technology Telecommunications telemedicine Twitter Uganda UN United States Ushahidi women World Bank YouTube
- 87,867 hits