Securing our Freedom

Many discussions about protecting American freedoms and the American way of life take place in rhetoric about the American Armed Forces and their campaigns abroad.  Fighting threats from terrorists, protecting American interests abroad and helping to depose vicious dictators.  But what about protecting our freedoms at home? Our individual freedom to privacy?

The first major controversy regarding American’s privacy and communications technology came  in October 2001, with the passing of the USA PATRIOT Act.  Among many other things, some of the most controversial aspects of the Act gave the Federal Government the ability to wire tap phones, access IP addesses and collect customer communcations history without securing a warrant.

Fast-forward to 2012. Companies like Google and Facebook collect our information for everything we do through their service (for example, Google keeps track of every single website you visit and analyses that data to provide “better service” to you and to “customize your internet experience based on your interests and patterns in search history”).  As our assigned reading for the week, by CNN’s Andrew Keen, points out, as we continue to demand a more personal experience from our smartphones and other ICTs, it will require such devices to gather, store and analyse more and more of our own personal data.  Your iPhone has a GPS in it that tracks your every move – helpful for when you lose your phone, but scary that a private company knows your exact location at all times (assuming you have your phone on and on you).

It’s hard to believe that congress hasn’t taken more action to regulate and protect our private information.  In fact, the government has done the opposite! President Obama signed a 3-year extension of the USA PATRIOT Act on March 26, 2011.  Only recently have our congressional leaders begun to look at the security of our personal information and information-storing companies like Google, Facebook and Apple. Al Franken (DFL), a Senator from Minnesota, is leading the charge on privacy. If this information is so unsecure in our country, imagine the possibilities of implementing this kind of technology in the developing world, where dictators, military regimes and government’s with less respect for civil liberties, may have access to all of their citizen’s personal and private information.

For more information, I have included a link to an op-ed written by Al Franken (MN-DFL) on Wired.com.

http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2012/03/opinion-franken-privacyliberties/

Advertisements

About Scott Hurtgen

Recent MHA graduate currently living in Iowa. View all posts by Scott Hurtgen

3 responses to “Securing our Freedom

  • msingh2

    I think this blog leads into an important point at the end. If developed countries like the United States are just now trying to find effective ways to secure the information within the country, it becomes evident that cybersecurity can be a major issue in developing countries where the government is unstable in the first place. Another issue that I think should be noticed is that often times we ask developing countries to use the developed nations as an example when implementing rules and regulations with issues such as cybersecurity. Yet, each country is different and a system that works in the United States may not work elsewhere. It’s important to customize programs to fit the needs of the people in each country.

  • sophiwaterr

    This is a prevalent issue that concerns the entire world. I agree with the comment above, cybersecurity might become a much larger issue as developed countries try to adapt to new technologies. The US’s difficulty protecting information on the internet comes from many sides. The public side wants their information protected, but wants the same freedom and access already available. [Certain] Companies want to access the information freely given by the public on sites such as Facebook and Twitter, but want their own rights and interests kept private. Can there even be a compromise that both protects and ensures our interests?

  • ahauser1205

    I can understand the necessity for legislation such as the USA Patriot Act in some particular cases. It makes sense that our government should have the power, in certain situations, to override restrictions which protect citizens’ privacy in order to protect the citizens themselves. However, I believe these situations are few and far between. The power this act grants the government scares me, because it can be easily abused, or used for the wrong reasons. This legislation can be useful as long as it is used under the right circumstances, but otherwise, should be used sparingly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: