Activist Bloggers in Vietnam

This article from Bloomberg Businessweek opens with a personal anecdote from one of Vietnam’s growing number of activist bloggers using social media and online resources to criticize the Communist government and its human rights abuses. Activists like Le Quoc Quan can face up to 12 years in prison for their “crimes” against the government, but the article discusses how a burgeoning “thirst for democracy,” growing online civil society, and the government’s flimsy censorship firewall prevent their deterrence.

This blogger activist example closely parallels the themes from the article we read for class on the “Zapatista Effect,” and it demonstrates how imitating that model is even easier now than before because of advances in social media. There is a growing consensus that regulating anti-government activity on the internet is outside the capacity of a small developing country like Vietnam, and activists are realizing the organizing and mobilizing capacity of online networks.

Because I (and many development practitioners) personally view communist policies and oppressive regimes as a worthy enemy of activist bloggers, its easy to applaud the ICT as a great tool for progress. I am concerned however that it is one which could just as easily be harnessed to destabilize and compromise the legitimacy of burgeoning democracies (with little verifiable evidence against them) which might otherwise contribute to positive human and economic development.

Its also interesting that the article mentions how some Western countries, (the U.S. included), are quietly supporting the activist bloggers  by criticizing proposed laws meant to restrict them, and at the same time attempting to form economic partnerships with the government working against the activists. This case highlights how state self-interest and human rights agendas continue to come into conflict, on or offline.


2 responses to “Activist Bloggers in Vietnam

  • dlach

    I can definitely see the resemblance here to the zapatista movement, and how it might come to be equally, or more, successful. I agree that these practices might come to be more common as ICTs continue to proliferate. I hope that they won’t come to be used to destabilize democracy, but have trouble envisioning a society where enough people would want to come together against such a government. If the masses were so inclined to blog together against a democracy, then that government clearly hasn’t been considering their input at all, and by definition can’t be a democracy.

  • cgalley

    Thanks for your comment. I have to disagree with you on whether an anti-democratic government mass of people could use ICT to come together against the government though: just consider more extremist or fundamentalist religious groups who have government allies maintaining power through non-democratic governments. Like in the zapatista effect, they could coalesce with other fundamentalists (even outside their country) and use ICT to leverage pressure against a burgeoning democracy. Its a hypothetical I hope is never realized, but its not hard for me to imagine it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: