Spider is a program out of Stockholm University which aims to support the use of ICT4D and poverty alleviate through project sponsorship and support in developing countries, with a primary focus on the “twelve priority countries” for Swedish development cooperation (Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia). Spider mainly supports projects related to the enhancement of democracy and the improvement of education and health services, which correlate with the United Nations Millennium Development Goals. I think its important to consider ICT4D as a means to achieve and end goal and not a end in and of itself. There’s a reason increasing Worldwide Internet Access isn’t a MDG! In order for a development project to be successful, the target population must be in demand of the service to be given (such as vaccines or textbooks). In Richard Heeks’ article ICT and the MDGs: On the Wrong Track?, the author addresses the controversial issue of developed, wealthy countries proposing a single, relatively inflexible path to development that they themselves did not pursue. Why should developing countries have to follow this agenda? Who says it is the right one to follow? The same goes for ICT. There’s no use in seeking to implement technology where there’s no demand or infrastructure to support it. Spider’s framework theoretically overcomes this obstacle in that it focuses in three main areas (democracy, education, and health) where there is a demand and a distinct possibility for the tangible application of technology for development and poverty alleviation purposes, with longterm results. With four “Networks” (hence the spiderweb metaphor), Spider aims to promote “synergistic collaboration and cross-breeding” based on geographic location of development theme. This allows experience and expertise to inform the various projects: “in addition to supporting and advising each other, the projects also feel that they are part of a greater effort, the compound impact of which surpasses individual parts”.
29 January 2014
The Swedish Spider Web
This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 29th, 2014 at 10:33 am and tagged with democracy, development, education, Health, ICT4D, MDGs, Sweden, technology and posted in Case Studies. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
One response to “The Swedish Spider Web”
- RT @gentile_orjulia: “@gatesfoundation: Why banks can, and should, take on the "unbanked": Video interview with @BillGates: http://t.co/6mu… 2 years ago
- Good intentions alone can mean a faulty foundation for #development. Check out our classmate's perspective: tulaneict4d.wordpress.com/2014/04/30/les… #ICT4D 3 years ago
- @AgroamCommunity how interesting! Is equity #access available to most agricultural partners in your communities? #ICT4D 3 years ago
- @wayan_vota Wow! Know of any similar projects or plans to continue/extend this trial? #ICT4D #SMS #literacy 3 years ago
- @melindagates What programs/organizations are combating deadly #mosquitoes? Which are most successful and what are the benefits? #IDEV 3 years ago
- #Internet Africa agriculture Arab Spring bangladesh brazil China Communication computers corruption crowdsourcing Cyber Security Cybersecurity development digital divide disaster relief disaster response disasters e-government e-learning education Facebook failure Failures in ICT4D gender ghana GIS google government Haiti Health healthcare ICT ICT4D ICT4D Professional ICT policy ICTs India infrastructure internet ITU Kenya kony 2012 mapping MDGs mHealth mobile Mobile Phones mobiles mobile technology Nigeria OLPC One Laptop Per Child Peru Poverty Radio Richard Heeks rural development Rwanda SMS Social Media South Africa sustainability Tanzania technology Telecommunications telemedicine Twitter Uganda UN United States Ushahidi women World Bank YouTube
- 83,420 hits