United Arab Emirates most detailed and useful ICT policy:
Last updated: 2012
Published by: ITU News
Last updated: 2007
Published by: UAE ICT
Other updates to the policy can be found at:
Digital economy rankings 2010
Last updated: 2010
Published by: The Economist
Measuring the Information Society
Last updated: 2011
Published by: International Telecommunication Union
The Global Information and Technology Report
Last updated: 2011
Published by: World Economic Forum
The UAE has an incredible ICT sector, one of the most developed in the world. It was easy to find information on their ICT policies because of the government’s strong support in building a foundation to become a world super power in technology. UAE was an extremely interesting country to research. It is way beyond all the other countries in its region and in most of the world. I would encourage other students to research this country to show much a country can accomplish with ICTs when it has the government’s support and money.
Reflections on something specific that you have personally learned this semester that you think would/will help you as a development professional.
This semester I constantly struggled with the concept of international development—what it really does is and what in means to me. I knew that helping people was something I was very passionate about, but at the same time I felt that most of the work done through international development projects had little to no significance in people’s actual lives. My other classes and organizations I worked with had taught me to constantly question service, and because of this I was constantly questioning the work of international development. It was not until the “The Zapatista Effect: Information Communication Technology Activism and Marginalized Communities” that I began to understand how ICT could actually be ICT4D.
The reason I found this article so important was because it was the first time I felt that ICT were actually used to empower people in developing world instead of to make money for people in the developed world. The Zapatista Effect demonstrates how access to inexpensive ICT allows marginalized communities to make positive change.
Before we had read this article, I felt like ICT4D was all about giving laptops to children and other poorly designed projects. The Zapatista Effect rejuvenated my belief in international development and also opened my eyes to the good that ICT4Ds can actually do. I was very skeptical about using ICTs for development in this class but now I realize how they can benefit all people.
Adam Papendieck spoke to our class on Tuesday about the latest developments in Internet and data technology: cloud computing, think clients, semantic web, open data, and of course LOLCats. His main interest is crowdsourcing and spoke about his experience working with Ushahidi. Like many students in our class, Adam’s background is in public health. He received his MPH from Tulane and is now the current Sr. Program Manager for Technology at the Payson Center for International Development and Tulane University.
Projects he has worked on:
• Creating of a web mapping application for the World Vision US corporate information portal
• Design and implementation of open source thin client computer labs in Rwanda
• Creation of e-learning platforms at African institutions of higher education
• Various crisis mapping initiatives and disaster analytics activities for the Gulf Oil Spill, Hurricane Katrina, and other events
Ushahidi was one of the projects Adam mentioned that I knew nothing about. After looking around on their website I learned a little bit more about it.
Ushahidi is a non-profit tech company that specialized in developing free and open source software for information collection, visualization and interactive mapping. “Ushahidi” means “testimony” in Swahili, and was originally developed to map reports of violence in Lenya after the post-election follow up in 2008. Ushahidi now has 45,000 users to map incidents of violence and peace efforts throughout the country.
The More Things Change: Development’s Colonial Heritage
This week in class we have been discussing the true meaning if ICT4D and the lectures have left me wondering if International Development is the career path I want to follow or if it is a lost cause. I have been leaving most classes feeling that our work is unsuccessful because most of the programs we discuss have been parachute programs brought in by people who do not take the time to understand the culture of the people they are trying to help. Instead, it seems that most programs are common day efforts of relieving “the White Man’s Burden”. Are international development assistance efforts the current day colonial relationships?
This blog discusses the links between the colonial period and current day development efforts.
The part of this blog that is most relevant to our class discussion is the section about Development and Welfare. In class we were asked “Do we still call them ICT4Ds if they are implemented in America/the Western world?” I would answer NO. Development programs will never be called ICT4Ds in the Western world because of the negative connotation of the word. Regardless of how similar development aide and ICT4Ds are to Welfare and the social services welfare provides, they will never be seen as the same effort.
We view development as “improvement of infrastructure required for efficient extraction of raw materials… directed toward enhancing the economies of the colonial powers” Basically we view development as going into an area that is not up to our standards of modernity and trying to “fix” it up until the lives or the locals are as westernized as ours.
We view welfare as “applied to the provision of improved health, education, housing, and urban wages… directed toward elimination or reduction of labor strikes, protests, and rebellions” Welfare is money and services we give to people who the western world already sees as modernized—or developed. Welfare is not aid given to help project western values and ideals onto “native peoples” but aid given to help sustain a developed country’s power by making sure all people are better off than “those” people.
We would not call welfare or any other domestic ICT an ICT4D because the term ICT4D is condescending and creates the image of helping “those” people—the other, the native, the undeveloped.
“Many of the drugs — even those approved by the World Health Organization — are Chinese fakes or low-quality variants that failed quality tests…”
One of the biggest problems the Health Sector faces in developing countries is eliminating malaria. But, with so many fake and low-quality malaria drugs being used, malaria is actually being accelerated! By distributing malaria drugs that are low quality causes drug resistance in the mosquitos. The drugs do not have enough potency to kill the parasite, but just enough to make it resistant. We are already using the strongest drugs we have in developing countries to fight malaria, and if we continue to produce drugs of low-quality medicines they will become useless and possibly make malaria untreatable.
The scary part is that the World Health Organization approved some of the drugs that were shown to not have enough medicine to kill the parasite. A study found that 20-42% of malaria drugs in Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa were of bad or fake quality.
We cannot reach our MDG if we continue to sell fake drugs. If we continue it is possible that malaria will become incurable in many developing countries.